sylvaridreams
Ultimately it's very funny to me the "character xyz did nothing wrong actually!" fans of every character that gets any degree of hate. OK. Sure. Have you considered though that it's vastly more entertaining and interesting if they *did* do something wrong though?
Said it before I think to sun and sage, and this isn't to pick specifically on Caithe fans, but-- blah blah, never ask a man his salary a woman her age or a Caithe-did-nothing-wrong fan what happened to the centaur settlement in the Silverwastes in 1304 AE! She did help do a massacre there. That's pretty bad overall.
And yet I really like Caithe! I think she's fun and interesting and she's nice to get to know throughout the game. I think these two ideas of "Caithe Did Something Pretty Bad" and "I Like Her" can coexist. Like it's great that she doesn't massacre villages anymore overall but also I think it lends more to her character that she actively participated in this brutal act than if we pretend that she's got mega girl power but only when it's convenient to some morally upstanding end, and otherwise she was just completely at Faolain's dastardly whims. Somehow!
Something about how every character needs to be morally upright and can-do-no-wrong for us to like them, and if they're not they must repent and atone and seek the ultimate forgiveness-- overall it's all very christian in nature and boring and it sucks. You reinvented catholicism is what you did. You made Rytlock confess his sins eat a cracker and atone. You shouldn't do that, he's more interesting without doing that. Personally I think Rytlock should get another divorce and kill another son. And Eir should have also had more secrets she kept, and Caithe should steal a full baker's dozen of dragon eggs from me, and Braham should actually be even worse at handling grief and take it all out on the Commander. These are all what's known as conflict in a story. And they make it sooooo fun. It's almost 2 am, are you rocking with me⁉️
queer-as-used-by-tolkien
I totally agree with this - characters DO do bad things, thats what makes the conflict, that’s what gives them the potential for growth and character arcs, that’s what enables complex character interactions! Without that, stories are bland and awful.
Saying ‘this character is bad unless they apologize/do better’ or that 'you can’t like this character bc Bad Things’ - that’s incredibly shallow. Braham’s 'bad’ moments in S3 were awesome. His comments hurt my Commander, poked her deepest insecurities, emphasized even more the awesome juicy conflict she was already dealing with in that story arc. I like that.
Caithe’s role in HoT did similar things - the theme was that really, we don’t know who we can trust. Her actions emphasized that point, and they ALSO showed within the Commander how all the suspicion was taking a toll, and how the Commander reacted to that pressure.
All good stuff, juicy stuff that contributes to the story and the arc and the message! All important! All good characters that are okay to like despite the bad.
I think 'liking’ a character is a nebulous term anyway! I like this one as a person, they are a good person! Or I like that one as a person because they had a complex growth arc! Or I like that one as a villain because he did evil things and I love hating him. Or I like this one as a character because of their growth, although not necessarily as a person I’d hang out with. Or I like this one as a role model. And I think all these have to be considered when someone says 'I like X.’
Its not wrong to say 'this character did bad things and they are interestingly complex to me = I like them’, but it is a vastly different message from 'character did certain things and I think those are good things that good people should do and be liked for, so I like this character’ which I feel is how a lot of people interpret 'I like X’ and is supposedly problematic if the character actually did BAD things and not good ones. But that’s incredibly wonky and I don’t think anybody actually thinks or means that. That’s maybe what it would mean if you said that about a real person, but real people are vastly different from fictional people.
Now you mention atoning, though, which I think is pretty important. You can’t have character growth if you go on doing the same things for the same reasons and never changing. Character relationships grow and change and evolve from apologies and treating each other better.
Of course some characters are villains and keep choosing bad and problematic and generating conflict, and those characters can be great as well and they can still be liked! I LOVE Bangar as a character although of course I hate his guts when I’m PoV: Commander. The story was made much better by him and I love his role. I don’t want him to change, I want revenge without the added complexity of him suddenly deciding he wants to change and atone. His character is best the way it is. He wouldn’t be himself if he changed.
But I think it’s great Caithe and the Commander resolved their differences in S3. I really like how Braham’s character grew in S4 past his grief. I really like the things Rytlock had to struggle with and I think having to kill his son was hard for him but also something he had to do - he grew from that.
I also like investigating where a character is coming from, their motivations and perspectives and the history that informs that. Them being other people from me gives me the opportunity to learn about them, and I think that’s beautiful and also good character and story design.
TL;DR I love these characters. Character growth requires the characters not be perfect right away. Atoning is pretty cool but not necessary. I love GW2 and obsessing about characters, the good, the bad, the ugly and the evil.